联想ThinkPad Z13笔记本电脑评测。AMD的高端ThinkPad，电池寿命长ThinkPad与XPS 13相遇--采用Ryzen。 为什么没有采用AMD CPU的ThinkPad X1？那是因为现在有一个专门针对AMD的高端系列，即ThinkPad Z系列。联想ThinkPad Z13 G1在我们的评测中提出了许多有利于它的论点，它是2022年迄今为止最好的紧凑型笔记本电脑之一。Benjamin Herzig, 👁 Benjamin Herzig (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy), Published 08/11/2022 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇸🇪 🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇭🇺 AMD Business Laptop / Notebook Radeon ThinkPad Ultrabook Windows Zen
不是每天都有PC制造商想在高端领域建立一个新品牌。然而，联想已经通过ThinkPad Z系列走上了这条道路。除了已经存在的ThinkPad X1系列，联想还向市场推出了ThinkPad Z13和ThinkPad Z16，它们将在价格和质量方面参与高端市场的竞争。为了使其面向商业客户的两个高端系列与众不同，联想为Z系列专门配备了AMD处理器，并采用了新的设计，以达到其他年轻客户层的要求。
根据它的名字，今天的评测单位，紧凑的联想ThinkPad Z13，目标是13英寸领域，使其成为戴尔XPS 13 Plus的竞争对手。 戴尔XPS 13 Plus和Apple MacBook Air.
Test device courtesy of Lenovo
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW (ThinkPad Z13 Series)ProcessorAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U 6 x 2.9 - 4.5 GHz, 55 W PL2 / Short Burst, 22.5 W PL1 / Sustained, Rembrandt-U PRO (Zen 3+)Graphics adapterAMD Radeon 660MMemory16 GB , LPDDR5-6400, onboard, quad-channelDisplay13.30 inch 16:10, 1920 x 1200 pixel 170 PPI, NV133WUM-N63, IPS LED, glossy: noMainboardAMD Promontory/Bixby FCHStorageLenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ, 512 GB , M.2 2242, NVMe PCIe 4.0, Single Sided, 410 GB freeSoundcardRealtek ALC3306Connections2 USB 4.0 40 Gbps, 2 Thunderbolt, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 2 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm audio jack, 1 Fingerprint ReaderNetworkingQualcomm WCN685x (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz), Bluetooth 5.2Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 13.99 x 294.4 x 199.6Battery51.5 Wh Lithium-PolymerOperating SystemMicrosoft Windows 11 HomeCameraWebcam: 1080p f/2.0 with IR and eShutterAdditional featuresSpeakers: 2-watt stereo, Keyboard: 6-row chiclet, 1.35 mm key travel, full size, Keyboard Light: yes, 65-watt USB-C charger, Lenovo Commercial Vantage, 36 Months WarrantyWeight1.196 kg, Power Supply: 300 g
Price1 EuroLinksLenovo homepageNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
潜在的竞争对手比较
RatingDateModelWeightHeightSizeResolutionPrice
90.5 %v7 (old)08 / 2022Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWR5 PRO 6650U, Radeon 660M1.2 kg13.99 mm13.30"1920x1200
86.9 %v7 (old)07 / 2022Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4Ki7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs1.2 kg15.3 mm13.40"3840x2400
90.2 %v7 (old)06 / 2022Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEi5-1250P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs1.2 kg15.36 mm14.00"1920x1200
92.3 %v7 (old)07 / 2022Apple MacBook Air M2 EntryM2, M2 8-Core GPU1.2 kg11.3 mm13.60"2560x1664
89.8 %v7 (old)02 / 2021Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEi7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs946 g16 mm13.00"2160x1350
外壳：ThinkPad由玻璃和铝制成联想ThinkPad Z13第一代
展示架盖子。黑色铝材，银色框架ThinkPads有一个声誉。黑盒子、大量的塑料、功利主义。ThinkPad Z13并没有完全远离这些根源，但它显然试图将设计推向另一个方向。这就是为什么我们有银色的金属侧面，还有哑光玻璃制成的手掌托。最初的ThinkPad Z系列在2005年推出，当时预示着联想的宽屏时代，就是这样一个案例。新的Z系列的设计也许不那么具有突破性，但由于其几乎不存在显示屏边框，它看起来已经比其他ThinkPad明显更现代。
ThinkPad Z13第一代的大部分是由铝制成的。塑料只出现在底盖和显示屏边框上。说到显示屏的盖子。我们的变体有黑色铝制盖子，但也有银色和黑色仿皮的。仿皮的型号没有银色的边，但它有青铜色的边。
就制造质量和坚固性而言，ThinkPad Z13的基本单元无可挑剔；外壳的质量和坚固程度极高。显示屏的盖子也很坚固，尽管没有基本单元那么坚固，因为后者比超薄的盖子要厚。
在铰链方面，联想也有新的突破，因为这种设计以前在ThinkPads上还没有出现过。铰链实际上是隐藏的，它们允许只用一只手打开显示器盖子。然而，它们在开启角度约为100度时变得僵硬。之后不久，它们就停止工作了，最大开启角度只有135度。这是一个遗憾，因为180度的铰链实际上是ThinkPad的商标。
显示屏盖上非常明显的反向凹槽也不是以前的商标。对于ThinkPad Z系列来说，这倒是一个与众不同的特征，而且它也有实际用途。它可以在打开笔记本电脑时用来固定屏幕。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
淘宝网戴尔XPS 13 Plus和Apple MacBook Air都和Z13一样重。这种情况也适用于 ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 10然而，它有一个更大的显示屏。这款ThinkPad X1 Nano明显更轻，不到一公斤。因此，虽然X1系列在重量上领先，但ThinkPad Z13却更加紧凑。它实际上与戴尔XPS 13 Plus 9320的尺寸相同，但厚度略小。MacBook Air更薄，但也更大。
尺寸比较
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW DIN A4 ❌
连接性。带有USB4的ThinkPad笔记本电脑联想只为ThinkPad Z13 G1提供了数量有限的端口--两个USB4和一个3.5毫米音频插孔。因此，ThinkPad Z13的端口与 X1 Nano.然而，Z13的两侧各有一个USB-C接口，这意味着它可以方便地在两侧充电。由于有音频输出，它的配置要比 XPS 13 Plus.
当然，这只适用于USB4真正支持Thunderbolt时。幸运的是，我们有一个Thunderbolt 3 eGPU底座。它与ThinkPad Z13配合得完美无缺，所以我们可以说。通过USB4的Thunderbolt技术是可行的。
左边：USB4
右边：3.5毫米音频插孔，USB4沟通联想ThinkPad Z13的所有型号都支持现代Wi-Fi 6E标准--但不是采用英特尔的Wi-Fi解决方案，而是高通公司的。高通公司WCN685x，也被称为高通NFA-75A，是一个2x2的Wi-Fi 6E模块，在ThinkPad Z13上没有任何重大问题，尽管有一些波动。总的来说，实现了高传输率，但在我们的测试中，它们被限制在Wi-Fi 6的速度。
ThinkPad Z13可以选择配备4G模块。尽管如此，没有WWAN配置，所以不能加装。
Networking
iperf3 receive AXE11000Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1662 (1600min - 1681max) MBit/s Average Qualcomm WCN685x (852 - 1777, n=21)
1606 MBit/s Average of class Subnotebook (772 - 1768, n=66, last 2 years)
1473 MBit/s Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
945 (924min, 924.87P1 - 968max) MBit/s iperf3 transmit AXE11000Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211
1558 (1401min, 1409.7P1 - 1609max) MBit/s Average of class Subnotebook (467 - 1824, n=66, last 2 years)
1338 MBit/s Average Qualcomm WCN685x (521 - 1838, n=21)
1321 MBit/s Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
865 (856min, 856.29P1 - 874max) MBit/s iperf3 transmit AX12Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1225 (540min - 1382max) MBit/s Average Qualcomm WCN685x (1049 - 1094, n=2)
1072 MBit/s iperf3 receive AX12Average Qualcomm WCN685x (1371 - 1537, n=2)
1454 MBit/s Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Wi-Fi 6 AX201
1259 (628min - 1412max) MBit/s
No graph data
网络摄像头网络摄像头被放在显示屏盖板上非常显眼的位置。它的质量对于一台笔记本电脑来说是好的，但并不突出。
5.6 ∆E11.2 ∆E16.2 ∆E15.5 ∆E17.5 ∆E15.1 ∆E6.3 ∆E19 ∆E9.4 ∆E11.3 ∆E14.5 ∆E8.8 ∆E6.5 ∆E14.2 ∆E5.5 ∆E15.4 ∆E9.1 ∆E16.2 ∆E2 ∆E14.3 ∆E15 ∆E14.4 ∆E9.7 ∆E7.5 ∆EColorChecker Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW: 11.67 ∆E min: 2.01 - max: 18.99 ∆E
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW
安全问题除了指纹传感器，联想ThinkPad Z13还有一个红外摄像头，用于生物识别登录。电子快门是一项新功能：不使用物理快门，而是按F9键就能以电子方式锁定相机。另一个新功能是微软的Pluton安全芯片，它执行dTPM芯片的任务。它还默认阻止了Linux的安装，但这可以在BIOS中轻松改变。
辅料除了65瓦的电源适配器外，没有其他附件。
维护联想并没有让看一下里面的东西太难。只有五个十字头的螺丝需要松开，它们仍然卡在盖子里。然后，在铰链周围的区域有几个夹子。这些可以用铲刀工具快速松开，然后底盖就可以马上取下来。
在联想ThinkPad Z13中，只有M.2固态硬盘是可以升级的；内存以及Wi-Fi卡是焊接的，而没有WWAN配置。需要注意的是，M.2固态硬盘是单面的2242固态硬盘；两面都有存储芯片的型号将不适合。当然，除了SSD的升级，你也可以更换电池或清洁风扇。
联想Z13：Wi-Fi版本的底盖是由塑料制成的
ThinkPad Z13：内部视图担保Z13有三年的保修期，默认情况下是带入服务。延长至五年是可能的，也可以增加意外损坏保护或高级支持等服务。
输入设备。全宽键盘和触觉跟踪板
键盘两段式背光键盘类似于 联想ThinkPad X1 Nano，但并不完全相同。其共同点是键程为1.35毫米。键盘的尺寸是不同的。联想在ThinkPad Z13中安装了一个标准宽度的键盘，这导致键盘在两侧几乎没有边框。这是一个值得欢迎的变化，因为更大的按键增加了打字时的舒适度。Z13是同尺寸级别中唯一拥有全尺寸键盘的ThinkPad。
对方向键的重新设计不太受欢迎，而且Z13不再有专用的上/下页键。一台商务笔记本应该有这些键。联想还修改了Ctrl键的布局，现在首次在ThinkPad上位于Fn键的左边--几乎所有笔记本电脑的标准布局。这对ThinkPad的长期用户来说肯定是一个调整，但如果需要，可以在BIOS中改变按键布局。
总的来说，该键盘非常出色，肯定是这个尺寸和重量级别中最好的键盘之一。更大的ThinkPad和更深的键程肯定有其优势，但在ThinkPad Z13上仍然可以非常舒适地输入长篇文字。
联想ThinkPad Z13：键盘触摸板和TrackPoint与键盘的变化相比，新的触控板具有相当大的突破性。这是自2014年和 X1 Carbon第二代以来的第一次以来，联想再次发布了一款没有专用TrackPoint按钮的ThinkPad。然而，与那时不同的是，我们现在有一个触觉解决方案，即点击只是模拟的，而ClickPad并不移动。通过这样做，联想实现了一件最重要的事情。增加了触摸板的面积。
这些修改有利于玻璃触摸板的用户体验，因为它比其他ThinkPads的触摸板更好。滑动性能很好，捏合变焦等手势也能顺利实现。更大的表面也使得你的手指不太可能没有空间来移动指针了。此外，触摸板现在可以随处点击了。
对标志性的红色指点杆--TrackPoint--所做的改变则不那么有利。先说一件事。新设计比2014年的设计要好得多，因为虚拟TrackPoint按钮非常容易配置。用户可以决定需要多大的力量来触发点击，以及点击的声音应该有多大--它甚至可以是无声的。
然而，联想未能解决这种设计的一个基本问题。没有物理按钮，就没有办法盲目地感知在哪里按压进行右键或左键。这只有在中央按钮上才能实现，联想在触摸板上放置了一些触觉点。这意味着，在使用过程中，你有时无法触发所需的按钮。随着时间的推移，这种错误会减少，你会习惯于新的解决方案，但这并不比拥有专用按钮更好。
ThinkPad Z13：没有专用按钮的TrackPoint
ThinkPad Z13：触觉式触控板显示屏。联想笔记本电脑采用哑光全高清液晶屏联想ThinkPad Z13亚像素矩阵
ThinkPad Z13：几乎没有背光灯出血现象联想为ThinkPad Z13 G1总共提供了三种16:10格式的13.3英寸显示屏选择。
WUXGA (1,920x1,200), IPS, 400 cd/m², 100% sRGB, 哑光, 低功率WUXGA (1,920x1,200), IPS, 400 cd/m², 100% sRGB, 有光泽的防反射涂层, 低功耗, 触摸2.8K (2,880x1,800), OLED, 400 cd/m², 100% DCI-P3, 带防反射涂层的光面, 触摸我们测得的峰值为418 cd/m²，但平均为378 cd/m²，比预定的400 cd/m²要少一点。这个数值使ThinkPad Z13低于其竞争对手，后者往往在450至500 cd/m²之间。
399cd/m²390cd/m²407cd/m²363cd/m²418cd/m²379cd/m²337cd/m²353cd/m²362cd/m²
Distribution of brightnessNV133WUM-N63 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 418 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 378.7 cd/m² Minimum: 18.8 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 81 %Center on Battery: 418 cd/m²Contrast: 1267:1 (Black: 0.33 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.7 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.81}calibrated: 1.1ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.3 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}69.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)96.5% sRGB (Argyll 3D)67.7% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)Gamma: 2.14CCT: 6499 K
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWNV133WUM-N63, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 13.3"Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 i5-1240pSharp SHP1548 LQ134N1, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4"Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEB140UAN02.1, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14"Apple MacBook Air M2 EntryIPS, 2560x1664, 13.6"Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEMND007ZA1-2, IPS, 2160x1350, 13"Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KLQ134R1, IPS, 3840x2400, 13.4"Display2%7%25%4%9% Display P3 Coverage67.769 2%74.6 10%98.4 45%70.4 4%76.5 13% sRGB Coverage96.599 3%98.6 2%99.9 4%99.9 4%100 4% AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage69.771 2%76.5 10%87.6 26%72 3%76 9%Response Times9%2%13%-9%13% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *49 ?(22, 27)45 ?(20, 25) 8%45.5 ?(20, 25.5) 7%32.9 ?(17.8, 15.1) 33%46.8 ?(22, 24.8) 4%38.9 ?(21.4, 17.5) 21% Response Time Black / White *23 ?(11, 12)21 ?(8, 13) 9%24 ?(12, 12) -4%24.9 ?(10.4, 14.5) -8%28 ?(13.2, 14.8) -22%21.9 ?(11.9, 10) 5% PWM Frequency53050 ?(100)Screen-50%-27%16%14%-9%Brightness middle418498 19%372 -11%526 26%460 10%494 18%Brightness379460 21%362 -4%486 28%434 15%474 25%Brightness Distribution8185 5%94 16%87 7%92 14%89 10%Black Level *0.330.53 -61%0.18 45%0.38 -15%0.27 18%0.28 15%Contrast1267940 -26%2067 63%1384 9%1704 34%1764 39%Colorchecker dE 2000 *1.73.65 -115%3.4 -100%1.3 24%1.1 35%3.1 -82%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *3.37.11 -115%6.7 -103%2.7 18%4.5 -36%4.2 -27%Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *1.12.16 -96%1.8 -64%0.7 36%1 9%1.5 -36%Greyscale dE 2000 *2.34.25 -85%4.3 -87%2 13%1.6 30%3.2 -39%Gamma2.14 103%2.45 90%2.13 103%2.25 98%2.2 100%2.41 91%CCT6499 100%6690 97%6158 106%6858 95%6475 100%6189 105%Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)65.7Color Space (Percent of sRGB)99.9Total Average (Program / Settings)-13% /
-31%-6% /
-16%18% /
18%3% /
9%4% /
-2%* ... smaller is better
灰度
饱和度
颜料检查器
灰度(已校准)
饱和度（已校准）
颜色检查器（已校准）开箱后，与理想值的偏差并不大，这一点从Delta E Colorchecker的值1.7中可以看出。我们用CalMan和i1Pro 2色度计对显示器进行了测试，我们还将其与i1Profiler一起用于校准。结果，Delta E值降低到1.1 - 像往常一样，相应的色彩配置文件可以免费下载。
色彩空间值还可以，但在P3和AdobeRGB色彩空间方面，仍有很大的改进余地。但至少小的sRGB空间几乎完全覆盖了96.5%，这样Z13就可以用于简单的图像编辑。
DCI-P3: 67.7%
sRGB: 96.5
AdobeRGB: 69.7%
在户外（阴凉处）非触摸式全高清显示屏的哑光表面显然有利于ThinkPad Z13的户外使用。然而，更高的显示屏亮度将进一步提高户外适用性。
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11 ms rise↘ 12 ms fallThe screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.4 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise↘ 27 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (31.9 ms).
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8265 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
ThinkPad Z13：正如IPS显示器的典型情况一样...
...没有任何问题...
...在视角的稳定性方面性能。AMD Ryzen 6000U在效率方面击败英特尔联想ThinkPad Z13有三种不同的CPU可用，都属于Ryzen Pro系列。属于AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 6650U，以及AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 6850U以及AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 6860Z，这是AMD专门为Z13开发的一个特殊型号。没有专用的GPU，所以买家只能选择AMD Radeon 660M(在Ryzen 5中)和Radeon 680M(在Ryzen 7中)。内存是焊接的，而且是快速的LPDDR5-6400类型，Z13有16或32GB的内存。M.2 2242固态硬盘的最大容量为一兆字节。
CPU-Z
CPU-Z 主板
CPU-Z内存
HWiNFO
GPU-Z
测试条件和联想ThinkPads的一贯做法一样，我们使用Windows电源管理功能来选择性能模式。我们的性能测试都是使用最高性能模式进行的，我们通过FN+T组合键禁用了联想的 "自动 "模式。结果，短期负载的功率上限约为55瓦，而长期负载的功率上限仍为22.5瓦左右。
处理器淘宝网AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 6650U是属于当前Ryzen 6000一代的中端处理器。作为一个U型处理器，其六个核心的典型消耗为15瓦，最大时钟速率为4.5千兆赫（基础时钟速率：2.9千兆赫）。我们的CPU基准测试文章可以参考我们的CPU基准测试文章，与其他处理器进行更广泛的比较。
联想ThinkPad Z13在CPU基准测试中得分很高。它的CPU性能优于许多英特尔竞争对手，也优于Apple MacBook Air M2，尽管这只是Z13的入门版本。虽然在持续的负载下，性能有点下降，但它仍然比大得多的Z13的CPU性能好。联想ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10在任何时候都更好。
即使在电池供电的情况下，CPU的性能也是完全可用的。
Cinebench R15 Multi endurance test
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U: Ø1239 (1154.73-1539.23) Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P; Ultra-Performance: Ø1512 (1481.98-1677.36) Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K Intel Core i7-1260P; Optimized: Ø1066 (983.94-1625.95) Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGE Intel Core i5-1250P: Ø1080 (680.55-1527.77) Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry Apple M2: Ø955 (863.48-1215.33) Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE Intel Core i7-1160G7: Ø659 (587.69-862.27) Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G2 20XGS01100 AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U: Ø1458 (1453.17-1466.65)
CPU Performance Rating: Percent Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core) Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU 7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 | 7z b 4 -mmt1 Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean CPU Performance Rating
Average of class Subnotebook
83.5 pt Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P
78.2 pt Asus Zenbook S 13 OLEDAMD Ryzen 7 6800U
74.9 pt Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
65.9 pt Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
65.1 pt Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry -5! Apple M2
64 pt Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P
57.2 pt Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE -1! Intel Core i7-1160G7
46.5 pt Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=76, last 2 years)
12149 Points +32%Asus Zenbook S 13 OLEDAMD Ryzen 7 6800U
10468 Points +14%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P
9743 Points +6%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
9195 Points Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (7805 - 9534, n=4)
8762 Points -5%Apple MacBook Air M2 EntryApple M2
8667 Points -6%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P
7282 Points -21%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7
5648 (4011.45min - 5648.13max) Points -39%Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2165, n=77, last 2 years)
1708 Points +18%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P
1678 Points +16%Apple MacBook Air M2 EntryApple M2
1585 Points +9%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P
1521 Points +5%Asus Zenbook S 13 OLEDAMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1488 Points +3%Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (1439 - 1476, n=4)
1460 Points +1%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
1451 Points Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=69, last 2 years)
4737 Points +33%Asus Zenbook S 13 OLEDAMD Ryzen 7 6800U
4060 Points +14%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P
3909 Points +10%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
3564 Points Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (3057 - 3684, n=4)
3399 Points -5%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P
2334 Points -35%Apple MacBook Air M2 EntryApple M2
2231 Points -37%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7
1750 Points -51%Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P
648 Points +14%Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 826, n=69, last 2 years)
648 Points +14%Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (548 - 578, n=4)
567 Points 0%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
566 Points Asus Zenbook S 13 OLEDAMD Ryzen 7 6800U
564 Points 0%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7
544 Points -4%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P
536 Points -5%Apple MacBook Air M2 EntryApple M2
216 Points -62%Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=74, last 2 years)
2007 Points +30%Asus Zenbook S 13 OLEDAMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1742 Points +13%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P
1677 (1481.98min - 1677.36max) Points +9%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P
1626 (983.94min - 1625.95max) Points +6%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
1539 (1154.73min - 1539.23max) Points Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P
1528 (680.55min - 1527.77max) Points -1%Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (1299 - 1555, n=4)
1443 Points -6%Apple MacBook Air M2 EntryApple M2
1215 (863min - 1215max) Points -21%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7
862 Points -44%Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 322, n=69, last 2 years)
258 Points +11%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P
240 Points +3%Asus Zenbook S 13 OLEDAMD Ryzen 7 6800U
237 Points +2%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
233 Points Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (230 - 234, n=4)
232 Points 0%Apple MacBook Air M2 EntryApple M2
222 Points -5%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7
208 Points -11%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P
201 Points -14%Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Apple MacBook Air M2 EntryApple M2
713 Seconds * -62%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7
625 Seconds * -42%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P
511 Seconds * -16%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
440 Seconds * Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (328 - 548, n=5)
416 Seconds * +5%Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=72, last 2 years)
366 Seconds * +17%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P
319 Seconds * +27%Asus Zenbook S 13 OLEDAMD Ryzen 7 6800U
310 Seconds * +30%7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Asus Zenbook S 13 OLEDAMD Ryzen 7 6800U
47500 MIPS +46%Average of class Subnotebook (11668 - 77867, n=69, last 2 years)
46936 MIPS +44%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P
43056 MIPS +32%Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (32613 - 41530, n=4)
37464 MIPS +15%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
32613 MIPS Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P
24625 MIPS -24%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7
22305 MIPS -32%7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Subnotebook (2643 - 6442, n=71, last 2 years)
5496 MIPS +6%Asus Zenbook S 13 OLEDAMD Ryzen 7 6800U
5431 MIPS +5%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P
5325 MIPS +3%Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (5175 - 5427, n=4)
5265 MIPS +1%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
5191 MIPS Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7
4596 MIPS -11%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P
3532 MIPS -32%Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 17218, n=65, last 2 years)
10583 Points +59%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P
9817 Points +47%Apple MacBook Air M2 EntryApple M2
8951 Points +34%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P
7672 Points +15%Asus Zenbook S 13 OLEDAMD Ryzen 7 6800U
7613 Points +14%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
6664 Points Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (6171 - 7227, n=4)
6594 Points -1%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7
4660 Points -30%Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Apple MacBook Air M2 EntryApple M2
1914 Points +31%Average of class Subnotebook (726 - 2350, n=65, last 2 years)
1870 Points +28%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P
1723 Points +18%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P
1622 Points +11%Asus Zenbook S 13 OLEDAMD Ryzen 7 6800U
1514 Points +3%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
1463 Points Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (1433 - 1487, n=4)
1456 Points 0%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7
1406 Points -4%HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=69, last 2 years)
13.4 fps +54%Asus Zenbook S 13 OLEDAMD Ryzen 7 6800U
12.6 fps +45%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P
11.8 fps +35%Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (8.71 - 11.8, n=4)
10 fps +15%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
8.71 fps Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P
6.77 fps -22%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7
6.06 fps -30%LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (50.3 - 63.2, n=4)
57.6 s * -1%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
56.9 s * Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=68, last 2 years)
54.5 s * +4%Asus Zenbook S 13 OLEDAMD Ryzen 7 6800U
54.1 s * +5%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P
53.5 s * +6%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7
52.7 s * +7%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P
44.6 s * +22%R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7
0.64 sec * -16%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P
0.597 sec * -8%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
0.552 sec * Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (0.521 - 0.59, n=4)
0.548 sec * +1%Asus Zenbook S 13 OLEDAMD Ryzen 7 6800U
0.529 sec * +4%Average of class Subnotebook (0.403 - 1.456, n=70, last 2 years)
0.525 sec * +5%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P
0.4928 sec * +11%* ... smaller is better
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit12942
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit32262
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit6062
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit2.79 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit16.19 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit114.35 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit233 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit98 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit93.3 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit1539 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)566 Points
Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)3564 Points
Cinebench R23 Multi Core9195 Points
Cinebench R23 Single Core1451 Points
Help... in comparison
Performance Rating: Percent AIDA64: FP32 Ray-Trace | FPU Julia | CPU SHA3 | CPU Queen | FPU SinJulia | FPU Mandel | CPU AES | CPU ZLib | FP64 Ray-Trace | CPU PhotoWorxx Performance Rating
Average of class Subnotebook
95.6 pt Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
81.3 pt Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, Radeon 660M
79.3 pt Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
62.6 pt Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
58.1 pt Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
51.5 pt AIDA64 / FP32 Ray-Trace
Average of class Subnotebook (1135 - 32888, n=69, last 2 years)
13688 KRay/s +48%Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (8854 - 10630, n=4)
9587 KRay/s +4%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, Radeon 660M
9235 KRay/s Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
6940 KRay/s -25%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5483 KRay/s -41%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
4195 KRay/s -55%AIDA64 / FPU Julia
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (56214 - 68106, n=4)
61846 Points 0%Average of class Subnotebook (5218 - 123315, n=69, last 2 years)
61742 Points 0%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, Radeon 660M
61725 Points Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
28020 Points -55%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
25348 Points -59%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
20481 Points -67%AIDA64 / CPU SHA3
Average of class Subnotebook (444 - 5287, n=69, last 2 years)
3044 MB/s +45%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, Radeon 660M
2103 MB/s Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (1881 - 2326, n=4)
2091 MB/s -1%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1945 MB/s -8%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
1795 MB/s -15%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
1395 MB/s -34%AIDA64 / CPU Queen
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, Radeon 660M
78797 Points Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
75217 Points -5%Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (69023 - 78797, n=4)
74266 Points -6%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
72801 Points -8%Average of class Subnotebook (10579 - 115682, n=69, last 2 years)
70538 Points -10%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
43991 Points -44%AIDA64 / FPU SinJulia
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (8320 - 9488, n=4)
8859 Points +1%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, Radeon 660M
8742 Points Average of class Subnotebook (744 - 18418, n=69, last 2 years)
7322 Points -16%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
5943 Points -32%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
4875 Points -44%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
4208 Points -52%AIDA64 / FPU Mandel
Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (30969 - 37461, n=4)
33843 Points +2%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, Radeon 660M
33175 Points Average of class Subnotebook (3341 - 65433, n=69, last 2 years)
32423 Points -2%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
16923 Points -49%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
14790 Points -55%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
11458 Points -65%AIDA64 / CPU AES
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
64346 MB/s +52%Average of class Subnotebook (638 - 161430, n=69, last 2 years)
56874 MB/s +34%Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (37259 - 93914, n=4)
53936 MB/s +27%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, Radeon 660M
42455 MB/s Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
38204 MB/s -10%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
31008 MB/s -27%AIDA64 / CPU ZLib
Average of class Subnotebook (164.9 - 1379, n=69, last 2 years)
752 MB/s +45%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
653 MB/s +26%Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (504 - 602, n=4)
542 MB/s +4%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, Radeon 660M
520 MB/s Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
515 MB/s -1%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
295 MB/s -43%AIDA64 / FP64 Ray-Trace
Average of class Subnotebook (610 - 17495, n=69, last 2 years)
7256 KRay/s +52%Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (4620 - 5468, n=4)
5010 KRay/s +5%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, Radeon 660M
4776 KRay/s Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
3657 KRay/s -23%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
3136 KRay/s -34%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
2358 KRay/s -51%AIDA64 / CPU PhotoWorxx
Average of class Subnotebook (6569 - 64588, n=69, last 2 years)
43971 MPixel/s +68%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
39591 MPixel/s +51%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
34217 MPixel/s +31%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
32881 MPixel/s +26%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, Radeon 660M
26137 MPixel/s Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (19643 - 26137, n=4)
24123 MPixel/s -8%
系统性能说到联想ThinkPad Z13的系统性能，我们几乎找不到任何可以抱怨的地方。它在日常使用和基准测试中表现良好。只有在复制数据时，它偶尔会多花点时间。
PCMark 10: Score | Essentials | Productivity | Digital Content Creation CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness PCMark 10 / Score
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7883, n=57, last 2 years)
6797 Points +23%Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, AMD Radeon 660M (5513 - 5958, n=4)
5708 Points +4%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5558 Points +1%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWRadeon 660M, R5 PRO 6650U, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
5513 Points Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1250P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5064 Points -8%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
4615 Points -16%PCMark 10 / Essentials
Average of class Subnotebook (9363 - 11406, n=57, last 2 years)
10476 Points +9%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
10404 Points +9%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1250P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
10128 Points +6%Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, AMD Radeon 660M (9578 - 9982, n=4)
9763 Points +2%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWRadeon 660M, R5 PRO 6650U, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
9578 Points Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
9482 Points -1%PCMark 10 / Productivity
Average of class Subnotebook (5435 - 10842, n=57, last 2 years)
8974 Points +14%Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, AMD Radeon 660M (7848 - 9094, n=4)
8522 Points +9%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWRadeon 660M, R5 PRO 6650U, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
7848 Points Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6900 Points -12%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1250P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6653 Points -15%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
6210 Points -21%PCMark 10 / Digital Content Creation
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 12442, n=57, last 2 years)
9137 Points +51%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6492 Points +7%Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, AMD Radeon 660M (5837 - 6447, n=4)
6073 Points 0%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWRadeon 660M, R5 PRO 6650U, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
6049 Points Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1250P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
5231 Points -14%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
4530 Points -25%CrossMark / Overall
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1667 Points +17%Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 2038, n=69, last 2 years)
1606 Points +13%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1250P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1554 Points +10%Apple MacBook Air M2 EntryM2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
1501 Points +6%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWRadeon 660M, R5 PRO 6650U, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
1419 Points Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, AMD Radeon 660M (1338 - 1432, n=3)
1396 Points -2%CrossMark / Productivity
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1575 Points +11%Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1918, n=69, last 2 years)
1537 Points +9%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1250P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1500 Points +6%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWRadeon 660M, R5 PRO 6650U, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
1415 Points Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, AMD Radeon 660M (1366 - 1440, n=3)
1407 Points -1%Apple MacBook Air M2 EntryM2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
1371 Points -3%CrossMark / Creativity
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1861 Points +23%Apple MacBook Air M2 EntryM2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
1848 Points +22%Average of class Subnotebook (372 - 2396, n=69, last 2 years)
1791 Points +18%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1250P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1663 Points +10%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWRadeon 660M, R5 PRO 6650U, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
1517 Points Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, AMD Radeon 660M (1397 - 1517, n=3)
1470 Points -3%CrossMark / Responsiveness
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1418 Points +21%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1250P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1409 Points +20%Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1889, n=69, last 2 years)
1334 Points +14%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWRadeon 660M, R5 PRO 6650U, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
1172 Points Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, AMD Radeon 660M (1106 - 1229, n=3)
1169 Points 0%Apple MacBook Air M2 EntryM2 8-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP0256Z
1055 Points -10%
PCMark 10 Score
5513 pointsHelp
AIDA64: Memory Copy | Memory Read | Memory Write | Memory Latency AIDA64 / Memory Copy
Average of class Subnotebook (14554 - 109035, n=69, last 2 years)
81225 MB/s +67%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
68214 MB/s +40%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
60724 MB/s +25%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, Radeon 660M
48558 MB/s Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
46915 MB/s -3%Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (31014 - 48558, n=4)
43745 MB/s -10%AIDA64 / Memory Read
Average of class Subnotebook (15948 - 127174, n=69, last 2 years)
77063 MB/s +93%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
70414 MB/s +77%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
64230 MB/s +61%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
48771 MB/s +22%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, Radeon 660M
39833 MB/s Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (34690 - 39833, n=4)
38217 MB/s -4%AIDA64 / Memory Write
Average of class Subnotebook (15709 - 117898, n=69, last 2 years)
82441 MB/s +61%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
62767 MB/s +23%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
61433 MB/s +20%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, Radeon 660M
51113 MB/s Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
50592 MB/s -1%Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (34563 - 51117, n=4)
46935 MB/s -8%AIDA64 / Memory Latency
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, Radeon 660M
126.5 ns * Average AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U (91.6 - 126.5, n=4)
114.6 ns * +9%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs
105 ns * +17%Average of class Subnotebook (6.8 - 187.8, n=68, last 2 years)
103.9 ns * +18%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
0 ns * +100%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs
0 ns * +100%* ... smaller is better
DPC延迟联想ThinkPad Z13没有任何延迟问题，在我们的YouTube测试中ThinkPad只掉了一帧。
延迟监测
LatencyMon 驱动程序
YouTube测试
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1250P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1749.7 μs * -123%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
1350 μs * -72%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWRadeon 660M, R5 PRO 6650U, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
785.1 μs * Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
732.2 μs * +7%* ... smaller is better
储存ThinkPad Z13: SSD这款小型M.2 2242固态硬盘来自Union Memory，它的容量为512GB。它的性能令人失望，尽管它是一款NVMe PCIe 4.0 SSD。在复制大数据量时，这款固态硬盘的速度明显较慢，但除此之外，在日常使用中，你不会注意到太多的问题。
AS SSD
DiskSpdLenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQSequential Read:
2723.45MB/s
Sequential Write:
1128.08MB/s
4K Read:
52.73MB/s
4K Write:
147.51MB/s
4K-64 Read:
780.1MB/s
4K-64 Write:
1446.24MB/s
Access Time Read:
0.081ms
Access Time Write:
0.028ms
Copy ISO:
1270.11MB/s
Copy Program:
242.84MB/s
Copy Game:
805.08MB/s
Score Read:
1105Points
Score Write:
1707Points
Score Total:
3311Points
AS SSD
DiskSpdLenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQDiskSpd seq_q8t1_read:
3049MB/s
DiskSpd seq_q8t1_write:
1814MB/s
DiskSpd seq_read:
3051MB/s
DiskSpd seq_write:
1760MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_read:
721MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q32t16_write:
341MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_read:
50MB/s
DiskSpd 4k_q1t1_write:
139.5MB/s
DiskSpd Loop seq_q8t1_read:
2809MB/s
Drive Performance Rating | DiskSpd | AS SSD Drive Performance Rating - Percent
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGESamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
82 pt Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
74 pt Average of class Subnotebook
66.7 pt Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEWDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
54.2 pt Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWLenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
49.2 pt Average Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
41.4 pt DiskSpd
seq readLenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGESamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4277 (4190.32min - 4277.35max) MB/s +40%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3871 (3794.8min - 3871.36max) MB/s +27%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWLenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
3051 (3022.87min - 3050.71max) MB/s Average of class Subnotebook (688 - 4852, n=67, last 2 years)
2943 MB/s -4%Average Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ (2244 - 3051, n=2)
2648 MB/s -13%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEWDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
1862 (1714.42min - 1862.11max) MB/s -39% seq writeLenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGESamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3968 (3782.62min - 3967.6max) MB/s +125%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
3121 (2981.01min - 3120.61max) MB/s +77%Average of class Subnotebook (102.8 - 5392, n=67, last 2 years)
2880 MB/s +64%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWLenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
1760 (1579.77min - 1759.77max) MB/s Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEWDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
1727 (1712.18min - 1727.12max) MB/s -2%Average Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ (1353 - 1760, n=2)
1557 MB/s -12% seq q8 t1 readDell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
6905 (5743.52min - 6905.08max) MB/s +126%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGESamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
6588 (6084.89min - 6588.24max) MB/s +116%Average of class Subnotebook (694 - 13544, n=67, last 2 years)
5516 MB/s +81%Average Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ (3049 - 3095, n=2)
3072 MB/s +1%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWLenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
3049 (2871.34min - 3048.82max) MB/s Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEWDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
2484 (2298.9min - 2484.14max) MB/s -19% seq q8 t1 writeDell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
5156 (5079.42min - 5156.48max) MB/s +184%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGESamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4805 (3760.61min - 4804.99max) MB/s +165%Average of class Subnotebook (107 - 9702, n=67, last 2 years)
4287 MB/s +136%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWLenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
1814 (1695.34min - 1813.56max) MB/s Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEWDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
1804 (1772.11min - 1803.55max) MB/s -1%Average Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ (1734 - 1814, n=2)
1774 MB/s -2% 4k q1 t1 readDell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
75.7 (72.52min - 75.72max) MB/s +51%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGESamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
71.2 (66.5min - 71.24max) MB/s +42%Average of class Subnotebook (19.9 - 95.2, n=67, last 2 years)
59.8 MB/s +20%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWLenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
50 (49.64min - 50.03max) MB/s Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEWDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
44.7 (44.04min - 44.71max) MB/s -11%Average Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ (33.1 - 50, n=2)
41.6 MB/s -17% 4k q1 t1 writeLenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEWDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
277 (263.14min - 276.6max) MB/s +99%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGESamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
213 (183.45min - 213.01max) MB/s +53%Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 287, n=67, last 2 years)
150.9 MB/s +8%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWLenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
139.5 (135.34min - 139.47max) MB/s Average Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ (66.7 - 139.5, n=2)
103.1 MB/s -26%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
49.9 (49.37min - 49.91max) MB/s -64% 4k q32 t16 readLenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGESamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3241 (1679.39min - 3240.76max) MB/s +350%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEWDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
1315 (1311.7min - 1314.99max) MB/s +82%Average of class Subnotebook (207 - 4286, n=67, last 2 years)
1226 MB/s +70%Average Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ (721 - 967, n=2)
844 MB/s +17%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWLenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
721 (692.26min - 720.59max) MB/s Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
544 (518.47min - 543.87max) MB/s -25% 4k q32 t16 writeLenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGESamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1750 (1179.86min - 1749.65max) MB/s +413%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEWDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
1283 (527.3min - 1282.99max) MB/s +276%Average of class Subnotebook (115.9 - 5007, n=67, last 2 years)
895 MB/s +162%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
377 (248.26min - 377.39max) MB/s +11%Average Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ (341 - 398, n=2)
370 MB/s +9%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWLenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
341 (324.03min - 340.98max) MB/s AS SSD
Score TotalLenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGESamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
4991 Points +51%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4522 Points +37%Average of class Subnotebook (515 - 9875, n=65, last 2 years)
4247 Points +28%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEWDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
3431 Points +4%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWLenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
3311 Points Average Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ (1993 - 3311, n=2)
2652 Points -20% Score ReadLenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGESamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2162 Points +96%Average of class Subnotebook (246 - 4048, n=65, last 2 years)
1364 Points +23%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1267 Points +15%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEWDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
1186 Points +7%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWLenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
1105 Points Average Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ (867 - 1105, n=2)
986 Points -11% Score WriteDell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2720 Points +59%Average of class Subnotebook (153 - 4469, n=65, last 2 years)
2245 Points +32%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGESamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1826 Points +7%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWLenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
1707 Points Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEWDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
1654 Points -3%Average Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ (739 - 1707, n=2)
1223 Points -28% Seq ReadDell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
4642 MB/s +70%Average of class Subnotebook (448 - 8075, n=65, last 2 years)
4291 MB/s +58%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGESamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
3577.18 MB/s +31%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWLenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
2723.45 MB/s Average Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ (2291 - 2723, n=2)
2507 MB/s -8%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEWDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
2228 MB/s -18% Seq WriteAverage of class Subnotebook (99 - 5479, n=65, last 2 years)
2851 MB/s +153%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
1930 MB/s +71%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEWDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
1707 MB/s +51%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGESamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1503.79 MB/s +33%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWLenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
1128.08 MB/s Average Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ (998 - 1128, n=2)
1063 MB/s -6% 4K ReadDell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
73.28 MB/s +39%Average of class Subnotebook (19.8 - 89.2, n=65, last 2 years)
58.8 MB/s +12%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWLenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
52.73 MB/s Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGESamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
52.64 MB/s 0%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEWDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
47.12 MB/s -11%Average Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ (36.3 - 52.7, n=2)
44.5 MB/s -16% 4K WriteLenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEWDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
237.4 MB/s +61%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
189.21 MB/s +28%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGESamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
182.62 MB/s +24%Average of class Subnotebook (37.4 - 251, n=65, last 2 years)
169.5 MB/s +15%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWLenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
147.51 MB/s Average Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ (71.4 - 147.5, n=2)
109.5 MB/s -26% 4K-64 ReadLenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGESamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1751.37 MB/s +125%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEWDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
916 MB/s +17%Average of class Subnotebook (181.8 - 3417, n=65, last 2 years)
876 MB/s +12%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWLenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
780.1 MB/s Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
729.57 MB/s -6%Average Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ (601 - 780, n=2)
691 MB/s -11% 4K-64 WriteDell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
2338.23 MB/s +62%Average of class Subnotebook (105.9 - 3905, n=65, last 2 years)
1787 MB/s +24%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGESamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1492.76 MB/s +3%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWLenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
1446.24 MB/s Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEWDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
1245 MB/s -14%Average Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ (568 - 1446, n=2)
1007 MB/s -30% Access Time ReadAverage Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ (0.081 - 0.087, n=2)
0.084 ms * -4%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWLenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
0.081 ms * Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGESamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.065 ms * +20%Average of class Subnotebook (0.02 - 0.167, n=65, last 2 years)
0.05637 ms * +30%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEWDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
0.053 ms * +35%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.023 ms * +72% Access Time WriteLenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEWDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G
0.069 ms * -146%Average of class Subnotebook (0.018 - 0.316, n=65, last 2 years)
0.06432 ms * -130%Average Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ (0.028 - 0.052, n=2)
0.04 ms * -43%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWLenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ
0.028 ms * Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGESamsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
0.023 ms * +18%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KSamsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR
0.021 ms * +25%* ... smaller is better
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW: Ø2809 (2592.29-3108.19)
图形卡的AMD Radeon 660M是联想为ThinkPad Z13提供的两个GPU中较弱的一个。作为一个集成图形芯片，它依赖于主内存；它没有自己的内存--因此，Z13的内存以四通道配置工作是肯定的。
在3DMark测试中，GPU性能高于英特尔的竞争对手，但AMD Radeon 680M要快30%左右。ThinkPad Z13在游戏测试中的表现稍显疲软。Radeon 680M在这里显然更好，而一些英特尔型号也领先于Radeon 660M。我们还注意到，在我们的TheWitcher 3循环测试中，GPU的性能在持续负载下会略微节流。
GPU的性能完全可以靠电池供电。
3DMark Performance Rating | 3DMark 11 | 3DMark 3DMark Performance Rating - Percent
Average of class Subnotebook
100 pt Asus Zenbook S 13 OLED -1! AMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
84.3 pt Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Radeon 660M, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
60.5 pt Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
60.3 pt Average AMD Radeon 660M
59.1 pt Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE -1! Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1160G7
50.2 pt Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1250P
49.7 pt Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGE -1! AMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
45.3 pt 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Subnotebook (995 - 16296, n=66, last 2 years)
10188 Points +55%Asus Zenbook S 13 OLEDAMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
9095 Points +39%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
6956 Points +6%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Radeon 660M, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
6560 Points Average AMD Radeon 660M (4636 - 7184, n=10)
6315 Points -4%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1250P
5475 Points -17%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1160G7
5465 Points -17%Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGEAMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
5424 Points -17%3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard GraphicsAverage of class Subnotebook (5577 - 61591, n=27, last 2 years)
44039 Points +51%Average AMD Radeon 660M (21857 - 33949, n=9)
30069 Points +3%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Radeon 660M, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
29079 Points Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1250P
22859 Points -21%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
19215 Points -34%1920x1080 Fire Strike GraphicsAverage of class Subnotebook (832 - 11887, n=69, last 2 years)
7625 Points +70%Asus Zenbook S 13 OLEDAMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
6683 Points +49%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
5421 Points +21%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Radeon 660M, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
4487 Points Average AMD Radeon 660M (3447 - 4993, n=10)
4472 Points 0%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1250P
4318 Points -4%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1160G7
4192 Points -7%Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGEAMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
3611 Points -20%2560x1440 Time Spy GraphicsAverage of class Subnotebook (804 - 4501, n=68, last 2 years)
3011 Points +90%Asus Zenbook S 13 OLEDAMD Radeon 680M, AMD Ryzen 7 6800U
2287 Points +44%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1260P
1758 Points +11%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Radeon 660M, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U
1588 Points Average AMD Radeon 660M (1016 - 1588, n=10)
1425 Points -10%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1160G7
1260 Points -21%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs, Intel Core i5-1250P
1098 Points -31%Lenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGEAMD Radeon RX Vega 7, AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5650U
1060 Points -33%
3DMark 06 Standard Score
27171 points3DMark Vantage P Result
23590 points3DMark 11 Performance
6940 points3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
133252 points3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
19921 points3DMark Fire Strike Score
4119 points3DMark Time Spy Score
1776 pointsHelp... in comparison
The Witcher 3 - 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing
Average of class Subnotebook (49.9 - 187, n=34, last 2 years)
132.1 fps +61%Asus Zenbook S 13 OLEDAMD Ryzen 7 6800U, AMD Radeon 680M
123 fps +50%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
99 fps +20%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, AMD Radeon 660M
82.2 (67min) fps Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
78.5 fps -5%Average AMD Radeon 660M (32.2 - 98.2, n=8)
77.7 fps -5%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
73.7 (61min) fps -10%
The Witcher 3 FPS diagram
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW R5 PRO 6650U, Radeon 660M: Ø12.1 (11-14)
lowmed.highultraGTA V (2015)
128.8
99.7
31.2
14.1
The Witcher 3 (2015)
82.2
45.9
19.7
12.6
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)
101
74.4
47.1
41.3
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)
43.8
20.7
15
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)
34.8
25
23
Strange Brigade (2018)
117.7
38.6
32.7
25.5
F1 2021 (2021)
103.8
47.3
36
14.1
Elex 2 (2022)
33.5
25.8
22.8
Ghostwire Tokyo (2022)
16.1
排放。具有良好冷却系统的ThinkPad Z13噪声排放ThinkPad Z13：带有两个小风扇的冷却系统在空闲使用和低负载情况下，联想ThinkPad Z13的两个小风扇几乎一直保持沉默。当它们运行时，通常是在32.35 dB(a)，几乎听不到。最大噪音水平为39.53 dB(a)，略高于其他ThinkPad，但大大低于戴尔XPS 13 Plus的风扇音量。 戴尔XPS 13 Plus.
在我们对ThinkPad Z13的评测样本中，线圈啸叫并不是一个问题。
Noise Level
Idle
23.71 / 23.71 / 23.71 dB(A)Load
32.35 / 39.53 dB(A)
30 dBsilent40 dB(A)audible50 dB(A)loud
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm distance) environment noise: 23.71 dB(A)
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWRadeon 660M, R5 PRO 6650U, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQDell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1260P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLRLenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIris Xe G7 80EUs, i5-1250P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQLenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1160G7, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512GLenovo ThinkPad X13 G2 AMD 20XH001KGEVega 7, R5 PRO 5650U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQNoise-11%5%-6%3%off / environment *23.7124.4 -3%22.81 4%24.9 -5%24.17 -2%Idle Minimum *23.7124.4 -3%22.81 4%24.9 -5%24.17 -2%Idle Average *23.7124.4 -3%22.81 4%26.3 -11%24.17 -2%Idle Maximum *23.7125.5 -8%22.81 4%31.8 -34%24.17 -2%Load Average *32.3540.4 -25%31.59 2%34.3 -6%29.92 8%Witcher 3 ultra *38.845.5 -17%35.59 8%34.3 12%Load Maximum *39.5345.5 -15%35.47 10%37.5 5%31.52 20%* ... smaller is better
温度压力测试(Prime95 + FurMark)说到联想ThinkPad Z13的顶部，实际上只有键盘上方的区域和键盘间距在压力测试和我们的TheWitcher 3测试中发热。相比之下，掌托仍然相对凉爽--手出汗不应该是个问题。在压力测试中，ThinkPad的底部明显发热，温度为44.3°C（约112°F），当长时间放在腿上时，会变得很不舒服。
经过一个多小时的压力测试，该处理器的消耗量约为14瓦特。联想ThinkPad Z13必须在CPU再次获得其全部性能之前冷却下来，因为在压力测试之后直接运行3DMark 11时，得分略低。
Max. LoadIdleWitcher 3
40.1 °C44.4 °C40.2 °C 37.3 °C44.9 °C33.2 °C 31.8 °C29.8 °C30.1 °C
Maximum: 44.9 °CAverage: 36.9 °C
36.8 °C44.3 °C42.6 °C34.2 °C40.5 °C38 °C31.4 °C32.3 °C32.4 °C
Maximum: 44.3 °CAverage: 36.9 °C Power Supply (max.) 40.6 °C | Room Temperature 24.3 °C | Fluke 62 MiniMax. LoadIdleWitcher 3
30.3 °C31 °C29.8 °C 29.1 °C31.4 °C28 °C 27.6 °C28 °C27.7 °C
Maximum: 31.4 °CAverage: 29.2 °C
30 °C31.5 °C30.9 °C29.6 °C30.1 °C29.9 °C28.1 °C28.7 °C28.3 °C
Maximum: 31.5 °CAverage: 29.7 °C Power Supply (max.) 32.7 °C | Room Temperature 24.5 °C | Fluke 62 MiniMax. LoadIdleWitcher 3
42.1 °C44.8 °C40.1 °C 37.8 °C45.3 °C32.3 °C 32.5 °C31.5 °C31.1 °C
Maximum: 45.3 °CAverage: 37.5 °C
39 °C45 °C43.7 °C35 °C40.5 °C39 °C32.1 °C33.4 °C33.5 °C
Maximum: 45 °CAverage: 37.9 °C Power Supply (max.) 44.3 °C | Room Temperature 24.8 °C | Fluke 62 Max+(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.9 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.9 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 37.5 °C / 100 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.5 °C / 90.5 F) and are therefore not hot. (-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-4.3 °C / -7.7 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWAMD Ryzen 5 PRO 6650U, AMD Radeon 660MDell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4KIntel Core i7-1260P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUsLenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEIntel Core i5-1250P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUsApple MacBook Air M2 EntryApple M2, Apple M2 8-Core GPULenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEIntel Core i7-1160G7, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUsHeat4%-1%13%11%Maximum Upper Side *44.941.1 8%45 -0%44.5 1%42.2 6%Maximum Bottom *44.348.8 -10%44 1%44.4 -0%47.5 -7%Idle Upper Side *31.428 11%31.2 1%23.9 24%24.3 23%Idle Bottom *31.529.3 7%33.2 -5%23.6 25%25.3 20%* ... smaller is better
发言人扬声器在底部。ThinkPad Z13联想将Z13的立体声扬声器放在底部--除非笔记本放在桌面上，否则这不是一个理想的位置。除此之外，它们是相对较好的笔记本电脑扬声器，也能提供一些低音。然而，与直接竞争对手相比，Z13在这个类别中并没有完全跟上。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.33 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.9% lower than median(-) | bass is not linear (16.1% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 1.1% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.2% difference to median)Compared to same class» 34% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 61% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 20% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 76% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4K audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 7.3% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.4% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.4% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (10.7% difference to median)Compared to same class» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 89% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.7 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.2% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.6% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 1.1% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (9.5% difference to median)Compared to same class» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 94% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 96% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGE audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.4 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.3% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.8% away from median(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (11.9% difference to median)Compared to same class» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 83% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 8% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 90% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能源管理。这款联想ThinkPad的电池寿命长，令人印象深刻能源消耗AMD和联想似乎对ThinkPad Z13进行了非常好的优化。2.4瓦的最低消耗量仅被Apple MacBook Air M2压低。其他空闲率也很有说服力--在全显示亮度、最大性能模式和启用所有无线设备的情况下，Z13的空闲消耗仅超过5.1瓦--低于所有对比设备。
65瓦的电源适配器有足够的容量，最大消耗约为63瓦。
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.3 / 0.4 WattIdle 2.4 / 4.6 / 5.1 Watt
Load
53.1 / 63.7 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWR5 PRO 6650U, Radeon 660M, Lenovo UMIS AM630 RPJTJ512MGE1QDQ, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 13.3"Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4Ki7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL21T0HCLR, IPS, 3840x2400, 13.4"Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEi5-1250P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, IPS LED, 1920x1200, 14"Apple MacBook Air M2 EntryM2, M2 8-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0256Z, IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6"Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEi7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G, IPS, 2160x1350, 13"Average AMD Radeon 660M Average of class Subnotebook Power Consumption-91%-6%-10%-14%-36%-41%Idle Minimum *2.47 -192%2.9 -21%1.87 22%3.3 -38%4.51 ?(2.4 - 8, n=10) -88%4.29 ?(1.3 - 9.3, n=69, last 2 years) -79%Idle Average *4.611 -139%4.9 -7%9.2 -100%5.7 -24%6.81 ?(4.6 - 8.7, n=10) -48%7.3 ?(2.5 - 16, n=69, last 2 years) -59%Idle Maximum *5.111.4 -124%6 -18%9.3 -82%9.1 -78%8.28 ?(5.1 - 13, n=10) -62%8.88 ?(4.1 - 16.8, n=69, last 2 years) -74%Load Average *53.159.7 -12%29.3 45%28.5 46%29.6 44%45.3 ?(24.4 - 61.5, n=10) 15%45.2 ?(13.8 - 78.6, n=67, last 2 years) 15%Witcher 3 ultra *27.649.4 -79%36.6 -33%27.4 1%27.7 -0%Load Maximum *63.763 1%63.3 1%31 51%55.1 14%63.3 ?(41.2 - 88, n=10) 1%68.3 ?(30.8 - 121.2, n=69, last 2 years) -7%* ... smaller is better
Energy consumption during The Witcher 3 / stress test
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø27.6 (25.3-32.3) Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø40.6 (28.4-63.6)
Energy consumption with an external monitor
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW; Prime95 V2810 Stress (external Monitor): Ø40 (25.2-63.4) Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW; Cinebench R15 Multi (external Monitor): Ø54.7 (51.5-63.4) Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW; 1280x720 FurMark 1.19 GPU Stress Test (external Monitor): Ø28.3 (26.4-31.6) Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø24.8 (24.3-26.1) Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø4.59 (4.47-4.82)
电池寿命充电时间：121分钟联想ThinkPad Z13 G1的内部电池容量为51.5瓦特小时。在对比的笔记本电脑中，只有X1 Nano的电池比较小。尽管如此，联想笔记本电脑实现了出色的电池运行时间，在这一领域轻松击败了英特尔代表。与Apple MacBook Air（该类别的最佳产品）相比，它很有竞争力，当然是在较低的显示分辨率下。然而，在我们的Wi-Fi测试中超过14小时（150cd/m²）绝对是一个非常好的结果。
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 103)
14h 23min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 103)
10h 24min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
16h 19min
Load (maximum brightness)
1h 53min
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WWR5 PRO 6650U, Radeon 660M, 51.5 WhDell XPS 13 Plus 9320 4Ki7-1260P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 55 WhLenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10 21CC001RGEi5-1250P, Iris Xe G7 80EUs, 57 WhApple MacBook Air M2 EntryM2, M2 8-Core GPU, 52.6 WhLenovo ThinkPad X1 Nano-20UN002UGEi7-1160G7, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 48.2 WhAverage of class Subnotebook Battery Runtime-39%-12%11%-17%-3%H.264979657 -33%654 -33%989 1%925 -6%993 ?(595 - 1425, n=29, last 2 years) 1%WiFi v1.3863414 -52%610 -29%910 5%596 -31%780 ?(389 - 1585, n=70, last 2 years) -10%Load11376 -33%142 26%144 27%98 -13%112.8 ?(48 - 228, n=43, last 2 years) 0%
Pros+ 非常长的电池寿命
+ 得益于Ryzen 6000的良好CPU性能
+ 高质量的外壳
+ 极其紧凑，显示边框窄
+ 功能齐全的USB4
+ 哑光显示
+ 可选的WWAN
+ 舒适的全宽键盘
+ 大型触觉玻璃触控板Cons- 复制大数据量时SSD速度慢
- 有限的端口配置
- 没有预配置的WWAN；没有5G
- 显示屏亮度低于竞争对手
- 没有专用的上一页/下一页键；显示屏的开启角度有限
评语。联想几乎用ThinkPad Z13钉住了它在审查中。联想ThinkPad Z13第一代联想和AMD之间的密切合作，首款采用Ryzen CPU的高端ThinkPad。联想ThinkPad Z13是ThinkPad品牌历史上的一个重要里程碑--因为这段历史到目前为止主要由英特尔主导。高品质组件和AMD的结合取得了成功。
ThinkPad Z13向竞争对手如戴尔XPS 13 Plus或Apple MacBook Air正面攻击。ThinkPad Z13在面对强大的竞争对手时很好地完成了这项艰巨的任务，因为它只有几个弱点，而有很多优点。一个由金属和玻璃制成的非常紧凑和高质量的外壳与非常好的输入设备相结合，特别是可能说服从其他笔记本电脑品牌转换过来的用户。集成的TrackPoint按钮也比2014年的第一次尝试效果更好。AMD CPU提供了高性能，但在温度或风扇噪音方面没有对效率做出大的妥协。相反，电池寿命很好，只是刚刚超过了 Apple MacBook Air.
只有几个缺点是必须接受的，以换取这个强大的整体包装。这包括相当慢的固态硬盘以及中等的显示亮度，它落后于竞争对手。Z13确实提供了WWAN，但在没有WWAN的情况下，它没有预先配置。此外，与X1系列不同，联想并没有提供面向未来的5G。端口配置对于这种紧凑的超极本来说是典型的，但至少一个全尺寸的HDMI端口肯定是一个很大的优势，特别是在商业领域。两个小的批评点。屏幕不能打开到180度，这与几乎所有其他的ThinkPads相反，而且缺少上/下页键。
优质的质量加上AMD--这就是联想ThinkPad Z13的结果。
总而言之，联想ThinkPad Z13肯定是今年迄今为止最有趣的13英寸笔记本电脑之一，这反映在其高分上。相比之下 戴尔XPS 13 Plus，它提供了更高效的CPU，并放弃了触摸条等奇怪的实验。而相比之下 Apple MacBook Air相比，它提供了更多的CPU功率，而没有牺牲电池寿命等方面。这款 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G10提供了更好的功能，但它的体积更大，而且耐用性更差。
Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG
价格和可用性在撰写本文时，你可以在制造商的网上商店找到联想ThinkPad Z13的几种配置。我们的评测配置目前的价格约为1465美元（采用第一个较便宜的型号，并通过 "打造你的电脑 "选项添加更多存储空间）。
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW
- 08/07/2022 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Chassis90 / 98 → 92%
Keyboard91%
Pointing Device93%
Connectivity62 / 75 → 83%
Weight73 / 20-75 → 96%
Battery90%
Display91%
Games Performance64 / 78 → 82%
Application Performance88 / 85 → 100%
Temperature88%
Noise96%
Audio69 / 91 → 75%
Camera36 / 85 → 42%
Average79%
91%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average
More articles related to this deviceLenovo ThinkPad Z13 21D2CTO1WW (ThinkPad Z13 Series)Review•ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 笔记本电脑评测：联想对... |News•新款联想ThinkPad Z系列首次采用触觉Sensel触控板 |Review•联想ThinkPad Z13 G1 OLED评测--配备AM... |News•联想ThinkPad Z13：集成TrackPoint按钮这...
Price comparison
Editor of the original article: Stephanie Chamberlain - Translator - 571 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2020contact me via: LinkedInTranslator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 611344 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:
Please share our article, every link counts!